February 7, 2012

Pointing Fingers: Dissecting the 3 Man United Goals


If you score three goals against an opposition, you should be the victor at the end of the game. No excuse. The only reason why the result might be anything other than a win is if that team displayed some terrible defending during the game. Let's look at what want wrong defensively for Chelsea in that 3-3 draw against United by analyzing the three goals the Red Devils scored in the second half.


The First Penalty

Picture 1.1 Rooney Operating in the Hole

After their third goal, Chelsea dropped off and defended deep. This allowed Rooney a lot more space than he was allowed in the first half. Here, United No. 10 gets the pass from Carrick near the center circle. Meireles and Essien, the two Chelsea central midfielders at this point, has been taking turns marking Rooney; this time it is Meireles who's the closest to Rooney.

As Rooney turns and dribbles the ball centrally, Giggs sneaks in behind Chelsea's two defensive block and makes a diagonal run to the left. With Meireles on Rooney, Essien should have been watching Giggs but the Ghanaian turns his attention to Rooney. To his credit, Essien nearly intercepted Rooney's pass to Giggs.

At this point, it is useful to note where Sturrige was in relation to Evra. He was not too close and not too far from Evra. His positioning was alright but his anticipation was not.

Picture 1.2 Sturridge Fouls Evra

While the United left back anticipated the pass from Giggs, Sturridge was a bit slow in realizing where and how United's attack was going. That meant that he now had to chase Evra who made the run first.

However, all is not lost at this point. Sure, Evra will definitely get to the ball first and might even get a cross in but look how many Chelsea players were back defending -- it was a 2 v 4 situation in the box and Chelsea could have dealt with the cross. It wasn't the best of scenarios but it sure wasn't the worse.

In reality, Evra didn't get to the ball quick enough to make a cross but he showed his experience by shielding the ball, expecting a challenge. Sturridge bit the bait along with the nasty hook.

Both Essien and Meireles could have done better against United's build up but, ultimately, Sturridge is responsible for this mistake.

The Second Penalty

Picture 2.1 Rooney Operating in the Hole Again

This time, Chicharito went out to the right wing to tap the ball back to Carrick. The Mexican was tightly marked by Luiz (in red circle). From then on, the build up to the second penalty was similar to the first: Rooney drops deep, receives a pass from Carrick and finds a pass to a teammate in an advance position. Again, Chelsea's central midfield pairing -- Essien and Meireles -- were torn apart by the movements of United players.

Chicharito pushes ahead of Luiz -- again, through, better anticipation of the play -- to get on the end of Rooney's through ball. As you will find out later, this will not be the last time the Mexican out-played the Brazilian.

This build up will end with Ivanovic "fouling" Welbeck but notice how far apart they were in the initial build up -- Ivanovic on Chelsea's right watching Giggs while Welbeck was making the run down the Chelsea's left.

Picture 2.2 Chicharito Passes to Welbeck

It turns out, Luiz wasn't the only one who was tracking Chicharito's run. Both Bosingwa and Cahill got dragged towards the Mexican, leaving the space wide open for Welbeck to run onto. Either one of them should have been in a position to close down on Welbeck. Instead, Ivanovic had to come all the way from the right to get the tackle in. It wasn't a penalty for me (a soft one, even if it was) but Chelsea's defending was terrible.

The Chicharito Header


Picture 3.1 Valencia's Cross and Rooney's Shot


The first stage of the United's attack for their third goal was all done by one man -- Valencia. The United winger has been kept pretty quiet by Bosingwa who, took the left back duty for the day. Valencia was later shifted to the right back position and that's when he came out to play.

The Ecuadorian picked the ball up in his own half and bombed forward. He exchanged passes with Welbeck before beating Malouda with speed. Bosingwa is now marking Welbeck, so it was Malouda's sole responsibility to track Valencia. Essien tried to help out but Valencia cleverly made an early cross.

There is two things to note as the cross comes in. One, Luiz is marking Chicharito and Cahill is looking after Rooney at the D. Two, Giggs is totally free on the Chelsea's right but it doesn't matter at this point because the danger is at the center.

Rooney controls the cross and took a shot as Cahill and Romeu stepped forward. Cech made another good save -- he made a couple in the game -- and palmed the ball to his right.

Picture 3.2 Giggs Gets Ready to Cross

As Giggs collects the loose ball, Ivanovic closes him down. Cahill, in the six-yard box, seems to be warning Romeu (Picture 3.2, top) that Welbeck and Rooney have plenty of space near the edge of the box. But Romeu does not move (Picture 3.2, bottom). Luiz stays close to Chicharito who anticipates where the cross is going to go and starts to make a move. The Mexican is actually boxed in by four Chelsea players at this point, there is not way anything bad can happen, right?

Picture 3.3 Chicharito Scores

Luiz was possibly distracted by Welbeck's run but he let Chicharito get a free header. It is pretty clear from all the pictures that we have looked at here that the Mexican is Luiz's responsibility and the Brazilian came short. Ivanovic and Cahill did what they could. Malouda, for the Valencia's cross, and Luiz, for the Chicharito header, were the two main culprits for this goal.

Carefree, wherever you may be... 

15 comments:

  1. Don't you think Ivanovic could have gotten out to Giggs a little bit faster? Giggs is an amazing crosser so to stand 5 yards off him isn't advisable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I think you can make that argument. But it is not the focal point, at least in my opinion, considering the big picture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sterling analysis once again. Webb's performance was poor but Chelsea's 3 goal defending was far worse. I know it soothes the soul to point the finger at the ref but better to face the music now and fix the issues. People harp on Torres not scoring the 4th but Chelsea shouldn't have to score 4 to win the game. How does a top team lose a 3 goal advantage in one half? I like David Luiz very much but he really was poor for the 3rd goal. We all know about Malouda. The first penalty was down to Sturridge's stupidity. I do feel bad for the defense as they're not getting enough help from the rest of the team. It's not about pointing out Malouda and Sturridge but if they could just adjust their attitude and workrate by a notch--it would make an enormous difference. It's frustrating that half of the season is gone and the usual culprits and stupid plays are still killing Chelsea.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think Ivan was afraid Giggs would blow or bamboolze him if he got too close. But yes, Giggs was given a very easy time to make that cross. Same happened for Torres (who had a much harder and longer cross to make though) for Mata's goal.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, another great analysis and I like your 'CareFree' unbiased style.

    Interesting point from your Guest about the defence not getting the support of the rest of the team. Many people jump to defend Torres when he doesn't score, some even suggest that he is doing as well as Drogba but let us not forget the great part Drogba plays defensively throughout a game.

    You have highlighted mistakes by David Luiz but I wasn't convinced with Cahill either. Maybe too early to be critical.

    All in all, it demonstrates to me that we can't do without John Terry just yet and I do wonder about the calibre of the players we are bringing in.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you all for the comments by the way. I appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't know what Drogba could have done in these situations but he helps out a lot in set piece defending (http://www.carefreechronicles.com/2012/01/not-cutting-corners-chelsea-defensive.html).

    And, yes, it is still early to make a judgement on Cahill. Terry might have been able to make the difference but not sure how well he would have handled the pace of both Chicharito and Welbeck.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Carefree,
    Excellent and dedicated work as usual.. Keep it up..

    I will have to disagree on your assertion that we defended deep once 3-0 up. The pictures you have up there does not suggest such. IMO we started defending deep after the 2nd PK (too late).. The moment fergie brought on Chicarito, AVb shoudl have reacted instantly.. Either you bring on Romeu in response or re-shuffle the positioning of the players ont he pithc.. Rather, the team lost focus and kept going toe to toe.. Even at that, I have never seen such half hazard "deep defending" where the players on the pitch had no clue on what they should have been doing.. AVB did not help issues either.. He brings on Romeu but no clear instructions on who picks up/shadow rooney who evidently was involved in all 3 goals by dropping deep.. Then makes matter worse by asking a tired essien to push forward in a triangular 3 man midfield (Miereles and Romeu at the base).. I will rather say Chelsea sat back without doing any real defending.. They just played a zonal game but leaving huge gaps in the midfield and the hole.... I have always been of the opinion that AVB does not know much about defensive set ups and Di Matteo (judging by his WBA days) does not know much about defending either..

    All the pics there shows a non compact defending.. the gaps and holes are just too much.. How can we claim to defend deep but the gap between the forward and midfield as well as the midfielders and the defenders was like the pathing of the red sea.. Compare such non compact defending to say Chelsea vs. Barca @ Nou Camp in UCL 08/09 season... Or even previous duels with Arsenal under Carlo after Chelsea took the lead..

    Goal 1 - You have the 2 DMs around the center circle... Valencia unmarked far right Seriously chelsea??
    Goal 2 - Rooney unmarked.. 4 Man U players vs. 5 Chelsea players that close to our Box 18? Again, seriously Chelsea? Miereles caught up the pitch..
    Goal 3 - Giggs unaccounted for.. Essien trying to mark Valencia.. Where is Malouda/Bossingwa? Seriously Chelsea?

    Since there was difficulty controlling possession like Barca does, we should have been compact first.. Move the defensive line into the box 18 and have the DMs closer to the CBs.. Rooney kept dropping into the hole but sometimes you catch Luiz push up to cover him.. That's totally wrong.. One of the multiple CMs should have primary responsibility for Rooney.. Also, the defending should have started from the frontline where mata/torres/Malouda/Sturridge should have set up shop in Chelsea's half around the edge of the center cirlce.. Would have denied Man U any space to operate..
    I bet none of those opportunities would have occured if the team stayed compact and denying the opposition space..

    Again, my opinion is that AVB does not know much about defending and he needs to get in someone to help him out.. that so called deep defending was pathetic at best.. No pressing in our halfs and players giving up way too much space for exploitation.. The poor defensive showing started from a lack of understanding and foresight from the bench.. Your pictures says it all.

    Great work sir..

    ReplyDelete
  9. I totally agree with everything you said. Just would like to add a few points to make a few things clear. Its not that AVB doesnt know how to set up a defensive team, it's that he doesn't have much respect for defensively minded set up. He wasts Chelsea to be this amazing attacking minded team that even after scoring 3 goals continues to push forward. But when his teams concedes 2 goals, AVB gets caught in this mindset were he is torn between protecting the lead or continuing the attack hence continued hybrid set up between more defending or continuing attacking. I think the best Chelsea is the type of Chelsea that harasses teams early on with tons of pressing and going forward. But once getting the reward (ie. 3 goals) goes into Mourinho-esque mode- impossible to beak down.
    Had Chelsea been absolutely committed to dropping back even at 3-2, we would have won the game, but this is a learning process. And now this Chelsea side will know more things about how to play attractive attacking football for the entire 90+ minutes if that is what the owner and the manager desire.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Having watched the game live , i couldn't bare to watch the highlights. :( .. we seem to lose composure , same thing happened vs arsenal. do you think Malouda's presence was anyway inhibiting a good possession ?? Does a lampard show better composure in bigger games?? Midfield conundrum for avb imo

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think you hit on a key term there - 'composure'. We can talk about tactics and formations all we want but if the team lack composure, everything goes to waste. Yes, we didn't have any composure once we went 3 goal up and looked nervous on the ball.

    Malouda lost possession several times in this game but it would be fair to pin everything on him since pretty much everyone, except maybe Mata, was losing possession left and right.

    Would Lampard have helped? In the midfield, possibly. And it is a fair point to make about his experience playing big games.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You have a lot of ideas here but let me just touch on a few.

    (1) when is a defense deep?
    When say Chelsea defended deep after going 3 goals up, I meant both in absolute and relative terms. Let's start with relative. Chelsea's defense dropped closer to it's goal after 50 mins than how far they were before. Even without comparing to where Chelsea's defensive line was before, I still think the line after 50 mins is rather deep. If you look at Picture 1.1, yes, Meireles and Essien were close to the center circle but also realize that everyone except Torres was back in Chelsea's half defending. I would call that a deep defense in absolute terms.

    (2) AVB and defensive set up

    Whenever I hear him talk, he talks about attacking football. It's his thing, his identity as a coach. So, it valid to say, with evidence in front of us, that defensive set up is not his strong suit. But is he totally ignorant of it, I don't think so. In fact, Chelsea has been defending much better in 2012.

    I appreciate your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I can only do my best to enrich your well put together analysis :-)

    You and EBJT definitely have made good points about AVB and defensive set up.. it is just not his thing hence poor "commitment" (i like how EBJT put it) to the cause.. To me that smacks of plain naivity on AVB's part.. Something he has to understand he will not get away with vs. top oppositions as his team is not where it needs ot be yet.. it is a compromise... 29 goals in 24 games when we conceeded only 33/34 in 38 all last season...

    I still disagree that our defense dropped closer to goal from 50min.. I will have to rewatch the game.. Only noticed any real defending once Romeu came on.. "deep defending" might have a different meaning to varying individuals.. I might rephrase by using EBJT's term that the team was not committed to it and worst of all the team was not compact.. The pictures you have up there with all those spaces/gaps is just criminal IMO.. I didn't know if I shoudl laugh or cry..

    Also, saying we have defended better in 2012 is debatable.. Man U is the first quality opposition we have played this season with offensive talent to make any team pay for lousy defending.... Compare to swansea/Sunderland/Norwich/Portsmouth/QPR/Wolves (conceeded a silly goal)..

    Sunderland ripped us open a few times earlier this season. If not for poor finishing, the scoreline might have been different. I will still give kudos (at least no more unecessary defensive high lines) but a lot of work needs to be done..

    But great discussions all round here.. Applies to you too EBJT..

    ReplyDelete
  14. Cheers for the great discussion to you too, Anyibuofu ,and a well done analysis, CareFreeChronic.

    ReplyDelete